Impeachment progressing at breakneck speed
A letter I wrote Saturday, published on Monday, was already dated once news of John Bolton’s book manuscript surfaced Sunday night. It then appeared likely that the President directly stated to Bolton his intent to withhold aid until Ukraine investigated the Bidens. Such is the dizzying pace of our news in general and the impeachment process in particular.
But here we are, all the more ironic in light of the Bolton news, with a President known to pay hush money to a porn star being defended by an alleged child molester and close associate of Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender of epic proportions. Quite the credentials to defend a sitting President.
How appropriate then to have Alan Dershowitz argue in defense that a President cannot be removed from office for abuse of power (further irony; he argued the opposite during the Clinton impeachment). Dershowitz: the President must break an actual law to be impeached. Delaying congressionally approved funds doesn’t qualify? Then how about shoplifting? Jaywalking? That’s a remarkable argument – a slippery slope with a monarchy at the bottom.
For now, the Senate Republican majority seems to be teetering – first towards, then against – hearing witnesses. Even if they do, many will vote to ‘acquit’ barring some new ‘bombshell’. The latest is that some Republican Senators appear relieved — relieved that they may have votes to avoid hearing witnesses. Wait?! What country is this?! Breathtaking. Those voting to keep the President will do so knowing that the truth will continue to come out with much more dripping to come. Care to bet against me?
A recent drip: General John Kelly endorses Bolton. Bolton’s book suggests Attorney General Barr, Secretary of State Pompeo, and even Vice President Pence being in on Ukraine. Next? Something brand new? Beyond Ukraine?
All senators faces reelection, a third of them this fall. True, the leaking Presidential ship may make it to port before sinking outright. But Trump will retire at some point and much sooner than most Senators wish to. If they vote not to hear Bolton this is all over by the Super Bowl; no matter that the latest polls show 75 percent of voters want witnesses. I urge the senators to consider the convenience of a short trial against what Bolton’s book will say (due out in March). Senators can have voters remorse, too.
Paul Mack
Columbus
The Dispatch Editorial Board is made up of publisher Peter Imes, columnist Slim Smith, managing editor Zack Plair and senior newsroom staff.
You can help your community
Quality, in-depth journalism is essential to a healthy community. The Dispatch brings you the most complete reporting and insightful commentary in the Golden Triangle, but we need your help to continue our efforts. In the past week, our reporters have posted 41 articles to cdispatch.com. Please consider subscribing to our website for only $2.30 per week to help support local journalism and our community.