WASHINGTON — Vape away.
Increasingly popular e-cigarettes and cigar varieties could be exempt from some government safety regulations if House Republicans have their way. It’s a move that alarms Democrats and public health advocates who argue that it could lead to unsafe products.
Legislation approved by a House committee last month would ease rules proposed by the Food and Drug Administration to regulate e-cigarettes for the first time. The legislation would prevent the FDA from requiring retroactive safety reviews of e-cigarettes that are already on the market and exempt some premium and large cigars from those same regulations. E-cigarette products introduced in the future would still undergo the safety reviews.
Vaping and cigar companies have pushed the exemptions, arguing that their products are safer than cigarettes and even help some cigarette smokers quit. They say that many of the small businesses who make their products would go out of business once the rules are in place.
Public health groups say the regulations could allow many newer tobacco products to escape scrutiny just as more people — including teenagers — are using them. As cigarette smoking has decreased in recent years, vaping and cigar smoking has gone up, and some of those products come in flavors appealing to teenagers and young adults.
“It pretty much comes down to driving a bus through public health protections,” Erika Sward of the American Lung Association says of the legislation.
FDA’s proposed rules, expected to be finalized as soon as this month, are aimed at eventually taming the fast-growing “vaping” industry. E-cigarettes are plastic or metal tubes, usually the size of a cigarette, that heat a liquid nicotine solution instead of burning tobacco. That creates vapor the user inhales.
The nicotine-infused vapor of e-cigarettes looks like smoke but doesn’t contain all of the chemicals, tar or odor of regular cigarettes.
The FDA proposed in 2014 that e-cigarette brands marketed since February 2007 undergo pre-market reviews retroactively once a final rule is released. The FDA would then ensure the product is “appropriate for the protection of the public health.” If not, the agency could take it off the market.
Republicans said the pre-market review would be a lengthy and expensive process. Gregory Conley, president of the American Vaping Association, says each review could cost more than a million dollars.
“There are thousands of small businesses and tens of thousands of jobs on the line,” Conley said.
In addition to e-cigarettes, the proposed FDA rules and the House legislation would apply to other unregulated tobacco products such as cigars, hookahs, nicotine gels, waterpipe tobacco and dissolvable tobacco products. The FDA already regulates cigarettes, smokeless tobacco and roll-your-own tobacco products.
Cigars that would be exempted under the House bill would be premium and large cigars, including those that are hand rolled. An owner of one smaller cigar company pushing the legislation, the Tampa-based J.C. Newman Cigar Co., says customers for Newman’s premium cigars are 45 and older.
“We are not the problem, but we could become an unintended consequence,” said Eric Newman.
The legislation could also make it easier for Cuban cigar companies to export to the U.S. market, if they are ever allowed.
Matthew Myers of the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids says the legislation is written broadly enough that some cheap, flavored cigars could fall under the exemption.
The legislation “is particularly tragic because of the very large numbers of young people who over the last several years have begun using these two specific products,” Myers said of cigars and e-cigarettes.
The cigar exemption was included in the original agriculture spending bill, sponsored by Rep. Robert Aderholt, R-Ala. The House Appropriations Committee approved on April 19 an amendment that would eliminate the pre-market reviews for products introduced after 2007.
The Senate has not weighed in on the e-cigarette regulations.
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have long enjoyed a close relationship with the tobacco industry, which has already given more than $1.8 million to members of Congress this election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And they are often smokers themselves. Former House Speaker John Boehner was a smoker, and Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., supported the industry earlier this year by vaping at a congressional hearing.
When Democratic Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut offered an amendment at the appropriations committee meeting to drop the cigar exemptions, committee chairman Hal Rogers, R-Ky., hinted he enjoys cigars as he called for a vote.
“In complete and full disclosure….,” Rogers said, his sentence trailing off. “I’m a sinner.”
The amendment was rejected.
You can help your community
Quality, in-depth journalism is essential to a healthy community. The Dispatch brings you the most complete reporting and insightful commentary in the Golden Triangle, but we need your help to continue our efforts. Please consider subscribing to our website for only $2.30 per week to help support local journalism and our community.