Skip to content
Sections
  • Obituaries
  • eEdition
  • Popular Content
  • Submit a Tip
Dispatch Mobile Logo
Share
Subscribe
Login
August 8, 2022
  • QUICK LINKS
  • Obituaries
  • eEdition
  • Popular Content
  • Submit a Tip
  • News
  • Columbus & Lowndes County
  • Starkville & Oktibbeha County
  • West Point & Clay County
  • Area
  • State
  • National
  • Business
  • Sports
  • High School Sports
  • College Sports
  • Local Columns
  • eEdition
  • Opinions
  • Local Columns
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Roses & Thorns
  • Dispatch Editorials
  • Obituaries
  • Lifestyles
  • Columns
  • Entertainment
  • Food
  • Transitions & Announcements
  • Community
  • Religion
  • Classifieds
  • Photo Galleries
  • Public Records
  • Building Permits
  • Marriages & Divorces
August 8, 2022
Dispatch Logo

Open eyes, open minds.

Home » News » Columbus & Lowndes County » DePriest on stand in trial

DePriest on stand in trial

By Dispatch Editorial Board • May 7, 2009

 • 5 mins to read

DePriest on stand in trial

Testimony from Donald DePriest dominated the third day of the trial brought against the Columbus businessman by former associate Oliver Phillips, who is suing DePriest for nearly $10 million.

DePriest is countersuing Phillips — a former senior partner of T.E. Lott and DePriest”s accountant for nearly 30 years — contending the case against him is not valid.

The entire day was dedicated to both DePriest”s direct questioning and cross examination.

During the long and grueling testimony, DePriest said Phillips was never a partner in the business which would become Charisma Communications Corporation. He also said the only reason he signed over 70 units of MCT Investor L.P. — a venture capital company DePriest owned — was to help Phillips build credit, and never intended for the accountant to keep the ownership.

Much of the testimony surrounded a few weeks in spring 1996 following the heels of a successful lawsuit filed by DePriest. DePriest had successfully sued McCaw Communications for violating a deal the company had made when they purchased Charisma Communications from DePriest in 1996.

DePriest said after Phillips heard about the lawsuit, he stormed into DePriest”s office and demanded money.

“He came into my office and in a loud and unusual voice said, ”Where”s my settlement?” I didn”t think he was serious at first, but he was very serious,” said DePriest. “He demanded $10 million.”

Phillips has maintained his claim for the money comes from a 1984 agreement signed by DePriest in which 10 percent of anything DePriest gained from Charisma would be transferred to him. Phillips worked closely with DePriest in 1982 to secure markets in the then-infant cellular communications industry.

DePriest has said from the start the document in question is vague and unfamiliar. He admits his signature is on it, but claims he had no knowledge of it until 1996 when he was confronted with it by Phillips.

“If this thing was ever in force, it is not in force now,” said DePriest.

In 1990 DePriest had also signed over the 70 units of MCT LP, which, according to DePriest, were handed over for Phillips to use as collateral on any loans he might wish to obtain.

After the stormy confrontation between DePriest and Phillips, DePriest sent Phillips a hand-written letter which offered Phillips $7 million for the MCT LP units upon the condition their financial relationship would be terminated forever.

Phillips rejected the offer, and on April 15, 1996, another meeting was held at DePriest”s office. This time, according to his testimony, DePriest offered Phillips a check for $5 million. DePriest had earlier requested a personal financial record from Phillips, because as his accountant Phillips knew DePriest”s financial history intimately and DePriest knew nothing about Phillips”.

newsletter

The Dispatch delivers the most in-depth, responsible journalism straight to your inbox. Sign up here.

DePriest testified that Phillips complied and gave DePriest a handwritten document outlining his then-current financial situation. DePriest said the document proved Phillips was not only financially insolvent, but it also had no mention of the MCT LP units nor his claim DePriest was indebted to him in connection with Charsima.

Furthermore, in 1986, DePriest said he gave Phillips a check for $ 1 million for the work he did on the Charisma licensing project. When the check was handed over to him, DePriest said Phillips made no mention of the 1984 agreement or any other money DePriest was supposed to owe him.

Part of DePriest”s counterclaim states he believes Phillips should have to pay him back the $1 million he gave him more than 20 years ago.

DePriest seemed to blame Phillips” anger and claim to additional money on simple envy.

“He was there in my office, and I don”t want to sound dramatic, but it was as if he was saying, ”Here you”re worth hundreds of millions of dollars and I”ve done all this work for you over the years and I”m only worth a few ten thousand,” said DePriest.

Phillips said DePriest actually offered him the full $10 million — $5 million at the time of the April 15 meeting and another $5 million due on Dec. 31, 1996 — in exchange for which, Phillips agreed to sign a release of financial debt owed to him by DePriest.

The plantiffs” attorneys produced a promissory note, which was dated April 15, from DePriest to Phillips for $5 million.

DePriest maintained the check he wrote on the same day as the promissory note — which he did not remember drafting — was the very note the check was supposed to honor.

Phillips attorneys confronted DePriest with both the note and the original certificates of ownership for the units of MCT LP which Phillips maintains were the collateral given to him by DePriest. DePriest said he didn”t know how Phillips got the certificates, but he said he didn”t think it mattered.

“It didn”t matter to me he had it, I thought it had been released when he signed the release,” he said.

The trial, which is being presided over by Lowndes County Chancery Judge Kenneth Burns is expected to continue until the end of the week. DePriest, who has operated several business both in Columbus and in the rest of the country, was formerly a member of the Tennessee Valley Authority Board of Directors until it was revealed the Internal Revenue Service had placed a lien against him for owing $1.1 million in taxes.

He is also being sued for several millions by others who claim they are also owed money by DePriest.

The Dispatch Editorial Board is made up of publisher Peter Imes, columnist Slim Smith, managing editor Zack Plair and senior newsroom staff.

NULL

You can help your community

Quality, in-depth journalism is essential to a healthy community. The Dispatch brings you the most complete reporting and insightful commentary in the Golden Triangle, but we need your help to continue our efforts. Please consider subscribing to our website for only $2.30 per week to help support local journalism and our community.

Subscribe

READER FAVORITES

  • Man sentenced to 40 years for Propst Park killing

    By Jessica Lindsey • 1 day ago

  • Community rallies around beloved waitress following house fire

    By Robert Scott • 1 day ago

Popular

Two Lowndes men charged with child sex crimes

August 6, 2022

Man sentenced to 40 years for Propst Park killing

August 6, 2022

Community rallies around beloved waitress following house fire

August 6, 2022

Golden Triangle Theatre finds new home at old church

August 6, 2022




On This Day 2021

Bulldogs feeling acclimated as fall camp begins

By Theo DeRosa

Featured Podcast

The C Dispatch Podcast

Dispatch

Sections

  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinions
  • Lifestyles
  • Obituaries

Info

  • About
  • Contact
  • Submit a Tip
  • Terms & Service
  • Popular Content

Contact

Main Switchboard:

(662) 328-2424

Physical Address:

516 Main Street
Columbus, MS 39701

Mailing Address:

PO Box 511
Columbus, MS 39701

cdispatch.com © 2022 – The Commerical Dispatch

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT