The Commercial Dispatch Contact Us
Advertise
Photo & Article Archive
Subscription Services
HomeNewsCrimeSportsOpinionsObituariesBusinessLifestylesClassifiedsCommunityeEditionVideo
News August 1, 2010

Article Comment 12 Comments
   Print
More than 100 join lawsuit over school uniform policy
 

STARKVILLE — A steady stream of parents and community members filed into the Starkville Sportsplex multi-purpose building Thursday night to join an appeal against the Starkville School District’s recent decision to implement a dress code policy beginning this fall.

The group, led by Booneville-based attorneys Daniel Tucker and Allison Worley, is seeking a temporary restraining order, a permanent injunction and other relief from the Starkville School District’s board of trustees and Superintendent Judy Couey. Along with Couey, board members Eddie Myles, Walter Taylor, Bill Weeks, Pickett Wilson and Keith Coble are named as defendants.

More than 100 people signed affidavits to join the appeal, which Tucker plans to file today in Oktibbeha County Circuit Court.

The appeal says that, following the Feb. 2 board of trustees meeting, the board determined requiring uniforms would be considered a fee, which would require the school district to issue hardship waivers, and that more than 60 percent of students in the SSD qualify for the free lunch program and would therefore qualify for a hardship waiver relating to the required uniforms. It also states the school board determined the district could not afford to clothe more than 60 percent of its student population and therefore could not impose a uniform requirement, so the SSD altered the uniform policy by changing the word “uniform” to “dress code.”

The appeal also alleges the board of trustees changed the wording from uniform to dress code to avoid financial obligation to those SSD students who would have qualified for a hardship waiver.

“The dress code, as adopted, is effectively a uniform policy requiring the purchase of a specific type of clothing ...,” the appeal reads.

The board of trustees has stated safety concerns as one of its main reasons for adopting the dress code, but the appeal alleges the board’s decision came without “substantive evidence to show how a uniform dress code will improve safety and security in the Starkville School District.”

The appeal also says, among other things, the dress code would decrease students’ creativity and individuality, lessen their enthusiasm for learning and limit free speech.

Several parents who turned out to the Sportsplex Thursday night wore maroon armbands.

“It’s a peaceful protest saying we are against the school board’s decision,” said SSD parent Kathleen Olivieri. “I believe that our school board, while well-intentioned, did not include us in on the discussion. We presented our argument to them and we don’t believe they really took it into account and discussed it. And if they’re not going to listen to us about uniforms, what about the real problem? Because the real problem is safety and you can wrap it up in a pretty present, but it’s not going to make it safe. The uniforms are not going to make our children safe. It’s just a facade.”

Fellow SSD parent Martin Coleman shared a similar sentiment.

“It seems bigger than uniforms now because the overwhelming majority of people seem to be against it,” Coleman said. “It’s just like, is the board member there to serve the members of the community or are they just there for their own agenda? They’re not elected, per se, but they are appointed by our elected officials, so it seems like they should be there to represent us. If the overwhelming majority of people in the community are against this, why are they trying to push it through?”

Merrill Bush, another SSD parent, also signed an affidavit because he is against the dress code.

“They say it’s gang-related, they say it’s for the betterment of the children, but I don’t see where a dress code is going to make you smarter,” Bush said. “If you got it, you got it. If you don’t, you don’t. If there’s any type of gang, uniforms are not going to stop a gang from doing ultimately whatever their goal is and what they’re set out to do. Starkville is not a big town like Detroit or Chicago. We don’t have the problems those major cities have. That’s my reason for opposing, and I kind of like the form of expression and individuality.”

Parent Stan Brown was opposed to the dress code for financial reasons.

“I don’t want to pay for it,” Brown said. “Just the cost of new uniforms that they’ll never use again and won’t use outside of the school day, I just don’t think it’s necessary. I don’t think they have the data to back their claims up.”

Mirage Bell, a freshman at Starkville High School, also is opposed to the dress code.

“It’s not any safer,” Bell said. “It costs more. It won’t be cheaper to buy a uniform because when you get out of school, you still want to change into something else.”

Starkville School District officials had no comment on the appeal, SSD Public Information Officer Nicole Thomas said.

Tim Pratt is based in the Dispatch's Starkville Bureau. His e-mail address is tpratt@cdispatch.com.

back to top

Are you on Facebook? Receive headlines in your Facebook feed or by following us on Twitter.

Related Content
Loading...

Reader Comments

12 reader comments

post a comment

sort by:    popularity     newest first     oldest first

Article Comment Starkville Mom comments:

3/12/2010 2:31:00 PM

We found an attorney who has a lot of experience in legal matters involving challenging School Board decisions. There are not many of them out there. The closest one we could find is in Booneville. It's just like if you are in a divorce you go to a family lawyer not a tax attorney. We could have gotten a local lawyer to take the case, but they would have had to spend time studying the laws surrounding school board appeals. Instead, we went strait to someone who already knew their stuff.

And I don't think there's necessarily any "prudence" in assuming those who didn't sign are for the uniforms. It's just as likely that those 5000 don't want them, but haven't spoken up for whatever reason. The only way to know would be to survey them. Oh, wait, we already did that. Survey #1 said 64% were against, and survey 2 said 67% were against. Here's a link to the data since it was incorrectly reported in this paper before.

http://www.starkville.k12.ms.us/education/components/scrapbook/default.php?sectiondetailid=17742&backPath=L2VkdWNhdGlvbi9jb21wb25lbnRzL3NlYXJjaC9zZWFyY2gucGhwP3NlY3Rpb25kZXRhaWxpZD04

It depends on your definition of "overwhelming", but I would say that some might interpret these results as the overwhelming majority of respondents said they didn't want them. Maybe that's where the guy in the article got his idea from. Or maybe he got it from talking to friends and neighbors. I know I have yet to talk to anyone who wants them.

Besides, if there are so many people for the uniforms, then why haven't they spoken up. Those against uniforms aren't the only ones with a voice in this town. I remember 3 from the forum. Add them to the school board and Mrs. Couey and I'll even give you everyone who answered yes on the surveys (we'll even add both together and assume that no-one voted in both) That makes a grand total of about 650 people who have said they want the uniforms. Where are the other 4350 people?

Article Comment WakeUp! comments:

3/12/2010 3:55:00 PM

Correction-- chosen

Article Comment JC comments:

3/13/2010 12:38:00 PM

Mr. Pratt, you're using the words "appeal" and "lawsuit" interchangeably, when they aren't the same thing. Tighten it up!

Article Comment Voted No comments:

3/12/2010 1:16:00 PM

Great article, Tim! I think this nicely sums up what most of the arguments against the uniforms are. Thanks to everyone who came out to sign the affadavits. I haven't heard the official count yet, but the lawyers said they brought 350 copies and there were only a handful left at 8:00. That's a lot of people, especially considering the number of people in Starkville who are opposed to the uniforms but are afraid to sign for fear of retribution, like teachers and other employees of SSD.

Article Comment DaBomb comments:

3/12/2010 3:38:00 PM

Keep typing Starkville Mom....you haven't said enough yet. :)

Article Comment WakeUp! comments:

3/12/2010 3:53:00 PM

S.M.-

I thought this attorney might have been chosed due to being a relative of one of the parents filing the appeal?

There is nothing in the survey that will hold up in court- it was not conducted using proven methods that measure statistical significance. This study doesn't appear to have used an independent, random sampling, which throws any validity right out the window.

For Example, if you ask 790 kids if they want to wear a uniform, they will say no. They might as well have sent a survey to NRA members asking if guns should be outlawed-- (I can tell you now 100% of those respondents will say no).

S.M., we all know that only people who are disgruntled or upset by a process speak out. Why would somebody for uniforms go out of their way to call the paper, issue a press statement, go to a meeting, etc. when they got their way in the first place?


Article Comment Golden Triangle Area comments:

3/12/2010 4:25:00 PM

Did the surrounding school districts had this kinda parental response when they implemented school uniforms?

Article Comment STUPID PEOPLE comments:

3/12/2010 6:14:00 PM

The only people that are going to respond are the ones not getting their way. Which is obviously the ones against the uniforms. So you have 100 people out of the whole school district to sign up for this.....WOW (sarcasim) If there were only 200 total Id say you might have something....but as it appears right now it just looks like a bunch of whining 2 year olds that have to put on a show to get their way. SORE LOOSERS GEAT A LIFE. Again this financial obligation crap is total BS. You buy your kids new clothes every year when school starts again. Cant lie about that, you know you do it. Uniforms are way cheaper than the clothes your kids want to buy and wear. I know...my children went to both private and public. Uniforms are way cheaper. And these so called low income families that cant afford....Amazing how their children wear $150 pair of shoes, polos....ect. So the people that are already getting handouts/donations....Its going to be a whole lot cheaper for the charities to purchase such clothing.

Article Comment Mad comments:

3/13/2010 11:53:00 AM

I want one more person to tell me how kids can afford $150 shoes and not uniforms. Just one more ignorant, un-important, self-imposing a-hole to say it. THAT IS THE EXCEPTION, NOT THE RULE!! I've been one of the poor people they are talking about and NO there is not always money or support there when you need it. I've had the gas turned off in my rented (not owned) home and told my daughter we were having slumber parties so we could pile up around an electric heater to stay warm. I've sat in court and seen people brought up on charges for stealing FOOD because their children were starving. I made paper crafts from printer paper I got out of the trash for my daughter's 3rd birthday because I could not even afford a toy from the Dollar Tree. If you have never walked in those (hand-me-down) shoes you need to shut it once and for all. I've had it with these people that are for uniforms slamming all the people that aren't. YOU need to get a life, YOU need to stop whining, YOU need to get over your damn selves.

IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT UNIFORMS, IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT THESE PEOPLE, IT'S ABOUT STANDING UP FOR WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN AND IF YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND THAT, THEN I PITY YOUR STUPIDITY.

As for "Stupid People" it's SARCASM, not with an "i" and it is LOSERS not with 2 "o"'s. But I guess you already knew that since you know so much.

THAT was sarcasm.

Article Comment STUPID PEOPLE comments:

3/13/2010 7:23:00 PM

"MAD"...........made my point didnt I??? Whine, Whine, Whine....The only ones makeing a show are the ones who dont want uniforms...just like you. And sorry I didnt spell a couple of words correctly...Had better things to do than to proof read....Like make my point about people like you. If they change the ruleing you want find me on here complaining that I didnt get my way.....like you and all the other stupid people acting like 2yr olds

Article Comment ridiculous comments:

3/13/2010 10:16:00 PM

The only thing most of you are proving is how disrespectful and vicious you can be regardless of the side you are on.Assumptions, accusations, name-calling---way to set an example for your children.

Article Comment Mark T comments:

3/14/2010 10:32:00 AM

Hey, why not give the dress code a chance? You obviously know how things are now. Give it a year at least on a trial basis and see if grades go up and violence goes down? Why is everyone afraid of change? It is all about the children learning, correct? Not about how they dress. Lets give them the best inviroment possible to learn in then. Wearing saggin pants and flashy gold chains is a distraction in itself. Make everyone EQUAL, and then let each individual speak with his or hers own merits! Kids shouldn't be submitted to feeling low about themselves simply because thier parents cannot afford $150 shoes and designer jeans. Low self esteam is a major problem and concern for a lot of kids not advancing. I say give them all an even playing field and try the dress code for our kids sake, or is it how you look that gets you thru this world now? I always thought it was the education we received when we were younger that would pave the way to our future? Thanks and have a nice day!

back to top

post a comment

Login is required to post a comment  why?  Having trouble with this new feature? Email support@cdispatch.com.

Username:

Password:

or register a free account

Forgot your password?


Most Viewed News Stories
1. Local gas station owners bolt from BP as others call for rebranding Columbus & Lowndes County
2. Convicted burglar gets 20 years Starkville & Oktibbeha County
3. Son takes father's place on Lowndes school board Columbus & Lowndes County
4. Mental health facilities, including in north Miss., asked to develop closure plans State
5. Businesses set the pace for United Way Columbus & Lowndes County

more popular content | the big page


The Dispatch on Facebook